Lesbian Jews Support Muslim Terror Suspect

Only In Canada...

Diana Ralph said fighting injustice is in her blood. Her father was a lawyer at the war-crimes trials in Nuremberg after the Second World War.
Diana Ralph said fighting injustice is in her blood.
Her father was a lawyer at the war-crimes
trials in Nuremberg after the Second World War.
(CBC)

A Jewish lesbian couple in Ottawa have been quietly offering support to a suspected Islamic terrorist even though they hadn’t even met the man when they first got involved in a fight against Canada’s security certificates.

“We had never met him at [that] point. We didn’t know anything about him. But we knew that the situation wasn’t right,” Jean Hanson told CBC News.

Hassan Almrei’s “situation” is that he’s been held in jail for more than five years on a federal security certificate without being charged with anything, and without knowing what evidence the government has when it claims he was part of a forgery ring linked to al-Qaeda.

Read More

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello,

In response to your comment on my post.

You said, "There are many reasons to be against homosexuality that are not Bible related."
**I wasn't going to go into this. My post was mostly trying to prove that the new Christian thinking was wrong. Evidently, the new Christian thinking is "Love thy neighbor as thyself "..unless thy neighbor is gay, or of another religion, especially athiests. Which I was trying to prove, using the bible, to be the wrong way of thinking.,

Homosexuals have a higher STD rate than straight people.
**This is not their fault neccessarily. If it was, then straight people wouldn't have ever gotten STD's.

You said, "Homosexuals engage in reverse gender roles and are therefore mentally unstable (because there is no mutated Gay gene in our DNA that says homosexuality is normal)."
**How do reverse gender roles make a person mentally unstable? There is no gene in our DNA of gay, no. They never will find one but that doesn't mean that people can be born gay. "Normal" doesn't even have a meaning to me. That's like saying "Being an Italian with blue eyes is not normal" What IS normal? What does this mean? Does not normal mean impossible?

Homosexuals make up the vast majority of peadophiles.
**HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Whoop de friggin do. Who has proved that? Maybe they just got caught more, but I'd like to see the statistics on that one.

Homosexuals are activly militant in their views and litterally try to force people (either by protest or arrest) to accept their degenerate lifestyles.
**Ok...So they're trying to get people to accept them. Where have I seen this before? OH YEA! Every friggin kid in Elementary School through College does that! Some of them are violent about it, like the bullies. Do you remember them? They beat you up for your lunch money, when they were really using it as an outlet for trying to get people to like them. The problem is people aren't accepting gay people, yet. Because the world is still in the thinking that "anything that hasn't been here for years is bad". Gay people have always existed, just recently came out of the closet because they're trying to be accepted for who they are now. Is that so wrong to be accepted for who you are?

Homosexuals do not contribute anything positive to the world's genetic pooling.
**Why's that? Because a gay couple cannot reproduce? That's not neccessarily true. and if it were then they wouldn't be contributing anything negative either, would they?

Homosexuals activly recruit children into organizations such as NAMBLA.
** I actually had to look this one up, because I had never heard of it. And it looks like they're recruiting people to sign up as an act of saying "We accept you" is that so bad? It's not like it's a cult that kills children off is it?

Homosexuals are usually radical leftists, Liberals, socialists, communists or Marxists.
**Whoop de friggin do. What does that mean? We shouldn't elect a democrat because they might be a closet gay? The main reason that they might be that way is because the conservatives won't accept them! Mainly because they're Christians! Which WAS the reason I posted the blog.

Homosexuals are more likley to comit suicide than anyone (even crazy postal workers, pissed off spouses and depressed teens).
**Again, because people DON'T FRIGGIN ACCEPT THEM. If people started accepting them, they wouldn't have to regret comming out of the closet and they wouldn't go kill themselves.

I could go on all day about it.
**So could I.

Have you ever thought that if it wasn't a genetic defect (which it isn't), it is social brainwashing by radical leftists that have infiltraited the media, schooling systems and in some cases, the government?
**You're right it isn't a genetic defect. It is something they're born with, but defect it is not. That's like saying that being gay is the same thing as having an extra arm. It's not. An extra arm, you might just cut off, how are you going to cut off gay? You can't. And what about people who are born with both parts? What if their parents decide they're a girl, and they decide later they're a guy. Does that make them gay? NO IT BLOODY WELL FRIGGIN DOESN'T! It means that that parent chose wrong, and they have every friggin right to fix it.

***I took a little breather after this to calm down.***

**I'd like to know why and how a group of people, like the media, and the government, can tell someone whether or not they are gay. I really would like to know your thinking behind this. Because frankly I don't get it. I've been watching and listening to the media for years and I haven't yet decided that I'm gay. I've been a tomboy, but not gay.

Have you ever researched the evidence to support the conspiracy theory that there was - and still is - a homosexual agenda being carried out in the White nations of the world? You should take a look into it without jumping to conclusions.
**I do believe that there is a homosexual agenda, but it's only to be accepted. Is that so wrong?

Many homosexuals - mainly the current trend of 'emo' kids - are victims of the homosexual agenda of ultra-liberalism which opposes the eternal laws of Nature.
**Emo kids, are hilarious for one thing. I'm sorry, but they were introduced to me my Senior year in High School, and they were only in the freshman class. I've met them and have talked to them, and so far understand that Emo is a trend, much like wearing guys pants was for me in Junior High, much like Backstreet Boys, or NSYNC was, it's a trend of wearing tight clothes that support the bands they listen to. Some of them cut themselves because they're depressed and they think that it's better to feel the physical pain than the emotional pain, but people have cut themselves long before there were emo kids, and people have cut themselves long before there were gays outside of the closet. Some emo kids kiss each other, but it's no more than any other fad following group of kids.

The FIRST law of Nature, as demonstrated by Nature herself, is survival of the species.
**Ok...So in that case, sense gays have survived this long, then they must not be genetic defects. What point are you trying to prove with this?

How do homosexuals positivly contribute to the survival of our species?
**Well, for one, that creates a couple of people who can adopt all those orphaned children that nobody else wants.

If they say that being gay is a genetic defect, or in their own mind what can be considered natural, then they admit that they are willing to add negative genes into the gene pool. That is immoral and will result in De-evolution both physically and socially.
**Um. I hate to break it to you, but girl+girl or guy+guy does not equal baby. They have to go through some other means of getting a baby, adopting. There are sperm banks for the girls, and there are adopting for the boys. THEREFORE, they are not technically adding any negative genes, nor or they adding any positive genes becaue it's not a defect. They are not wrong for being gay, it's not a mistake made by the doctors that they are gay. But they are born with it. Just like we're born with the attraction to the opposite, they're born with the attraction to the same.

If they say it is a social mindset and a chosen way of life, then they are victims of propaganda and are weak minded. Therefore, if there were to procreate, they would be contributing negative genetic defects into the family tree of humanity.
**It isn't a chosen way of life.

Do you believe that following the will of the individual - even if it will contribute to the backwards evolution of our human species - is more important than the good of the whole human species?
**How does being gay contribute to the "backwards evolution" of our human species? How are we backwards evolving? I missed this one. I'm pretty sure we're still moving forward. Infact, I think they might actually contribute to our moving forward. ESPECIALLY if we just accept them and move on.